Teams

TSetzer (WSRC)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM

10 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-25vs KHeidkamp/LBoatman (PCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Setzer / Celia Stallings vs Tonja Padgett / Monica Smith3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-18vs LVanderbosch/JSanderson (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Blocksom / Alix Pavlic Phillips vs Karol Beverley / Anita Matai0-6, 2-6
2025-03-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesTerri Setzer / Kimberly Clark vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-21vs LWallace/BHoff (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBobbie McManus / Terri Setzer vs Heidi Friedman / Paige Reece4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-14vs KHammack (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Sterrett / Sally Blocksom vs Chantal Powers / Susan McGarry1-6, 3-6
2025-03-07vs JMu/LConover (Mason Wallace)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Johnson / Terri Setzer vs Debbie Alexander / Linda Burks-Adams6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Terri Setzer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Sandy Johnson
published
3.02
Karen Sterrett
published
2.96
Anne Mauldin
published 3.5
2.95
2.89
Kimberly Clark
published
2.88
Sally Blocksom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Bobbie McManus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.65
Delane Lovelace
published 3
2.63
Celia Stallings
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bobbie McManus + Terri Setzer044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Terri Setzer
37W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Sandy Johnson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Karen Sterrett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
3.5
Anne Mauldin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
3.5
Alix Pavlic Phillips
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Kimberly Clark
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Sally Blocksom
129W–70L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3.5
Bobbie McManus
34W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Delane Lovelace
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Celia Stallings
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.