Teams

WW-Wright

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.43 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-21Won 20
W#2 DoublesCary Broocks / Ashley Wright Henry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Altaffer / Kevin Calhoun vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-26vs ACAC-HallSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Mark Schwartz vs Kim Alley / Neil Perron2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Zachary King vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-05vs ACAC-ChandlerLost 01
L#3 DoublesBecky Oatts / Richard Godsey vs Diego Marti Vertiz / Sonya Carman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-23vs MAC-LoosWon 20
W#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Zachary King vs Debbie Messmer / John DiNardi6-3, 3-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Cary Broocks vs Wayne Motley / Denise Terrell6-1, 6-0
2022-01-22vs BURK-ButterworthLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Calhoun / Leslie Altaffer vs Blake Goldsmith / Henrique Guidi2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Clara Laing
published 5
4.51
Seth Feibelman
published
4.43
Kevin Calhoun
published
4.38
Leslie Altaffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
Robert Quinn
published
4.28
Elizabeth Kelly
published 4.5
Anna Shea
published 4.5
4.21
Richard Godsey
published
4.11
Mark Schwartz
published
4.02
Becky Oatts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Craig Heah
published 4
3.67
Lauren Jones
published
3.51
Ashley Wright Henry
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Seth Feibelman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.83
Seth Feibelman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
4.51
Kevin Calhoun
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Leslie Altaffer
72W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
Robert Quinn
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Godsey
8W–0L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Mark Schwartz
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Becky Oatts
57W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Craig Heah
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Lauren Jones
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ashley Wright Henry
47W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.