Teams

13 Belmont Bates Bouncers

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-07vs 19 Woodlake LarocheLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Benson / Susan Staton vs Suzanne Snyder / Sandra Bavaro4-6, 4-6
2022-04-30vs 17 LPC EarleWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Staton / Linda Benson vs Evelyn Circeo / Carolyn Elgin6-2, 7-5
2022-04-16vs 22 Willow Oaks Knierim/ChenaultWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Staton / Linda Benson vs Polly Brooks / Kelly Beazley1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Susan Staton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.85
Anne Wolff
published 3
2.78
Linda Benson
published
2.77
Sue Mathe
published
2.68
Tina Carter
published
2.67
Anne Walker
published 3
2.65
Susanna Dodd
published
2.63
Ruth Bates
published
2.38
Jane Harrison
published
2.24
Nancy Broaddus
published
2.13
Diana Plasberg
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Staton + Anne Wolff3450% games+0.3% vs expected
Ruth Bates + Jane Harrison033 matchesnot enough data
Anne Walker + Anne Wolff123 matchesnot enough data
Jane Harrison + Nancy Broaddus033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Staton
132W–142L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Anne Wolff
23W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Linda Benson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.78
Sue Mathe
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Tina Carter
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Anne Walker
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Susanna Dodd
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Ruth Bates
7W–21L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Jane Harrison
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38
Nancy Broaddus
6W–23L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.24
2.5
Diana Plasberg
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.