← Teams

MPRC-Conan/Skoog

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.42 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Molly Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Jennifer Noble
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Marilyn Sims
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Lori Zoborowski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Ann Skoog
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
2.96
Kristi Tompkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Hasol Yu
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 0
Results10 ties
2020-02-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMarilyn Sims / Jennifer Noble vs Ann Cassin / Helen Lee6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Kelsey Cleveland1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHasol Yu vs Crystal Miller6-1, 6-2
2020-02-16Lost 1–2
W#1 SinglesHasol Yu vs Mia Birk7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristi Tompkins / Alison Toal vs Yoko Moore / Tammy Cofield6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPenny Shaw / Molly Taylor vs Mary Murphy / Kim Hasle6-3, 6-3
2020-02-15Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesHasol Yu vs Erin Hill7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2020-02-08Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJanet Cathcart / Marilyn Sims vs Kate Leatherbarrow / Laura Maginnis1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHasol Yu vs Suzanne Chambers6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Zoborowski / Kristi Tompkins vs Terry Mettler / Maryam Farinola2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Misuzu Komine6-1, 7-6
2020-01-25Lost 0–4
L#1 SinglesHasol Yu vs Stephanie Paulson6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichelle Coleman / Lori Zoborowski vs Michele Hart / Elizabeth Domagalski2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Ronda Atwood6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlison Toal / Molly Taylor vs Kim Christensen / Kathryn Eddy6-2, 6-2
2020-01-17Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Kimiko Kotsugi6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMolly Taylor vs Gretchen Hall3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Zoborowski / Penny Shaw vs Wanda Ng / Jinquan Wu6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2020-01-11Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesHasol Yu vs Vickie Maletteri7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Noble / Molly Taylor vs Gina Meyer / Rebecca Harris6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Katie Terrill6-3, 7-6
2020-01-05Won 4–0
W#1 SinglesAnn Skoog vs Sammie Sue Willenborg6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Zoborowski / Kristi Tompkins vs Kathi Gray / Karen Groenweghe6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesHasol Yu vs Beth Ruff6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Sims / Anna Salita vs Shelley Kolb / Swathi Karlapati6-1, 6-3
2019-12-15Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRyan Chin / Hasol Yu vs Eugene Jung / Jackie Dooris3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2019-12-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesRyan Chin / Hasol Yu vs Allison Schenk / Craig Hlady6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Molly Taylor
57W–28L career
0%91%9%
3.43
3.5
Jennifer Noble
43W–21L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Marilyn Sims
44W–24L career
1%98%1%
3.27
3.5
Lori Zoborowski
23W–29L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Ann Skoog
43W–66L career
12%88%0%
3.10
3
Kristi Tompkins
67W–79L career · type A
0%88%12%
2.96
0
Hasol Yu
12W–5L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.