Teams

GBeal (Gaston CC)

2022 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-21vs CLin (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Covitz / Steven Cherry vs Chin Lin / Robert Duffy5-7, 4-6
2022-09-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesGary Covitz / Steven Cherry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-31vs CLin (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesErik Witten / MARK TERRIO vs David Bowman / Steven Todd6-2, 6-4
2022-08-24vs CLin (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Lineberger / MARK TERRIO vs Chin Lin / Jim Northrup6-2, 6-4
2022-08-17vs CLin (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesErik Witten / MARK TERRIO vs Chin Lin / Robert Duffy6-4, 6-0
2022-08-10vs CLin (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesErik Witten / MARK TERRIO vs Jerry Holman / Steven Horvath6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGary Covitz / Robert Barbour vs Gary Usher / Robert Duffy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 7.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Erik Witten
published 4
3.72
Gary Covitz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
MARK TERRIO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Giles Beal
published 3.5
3.12
Howard Epstein
published 3.5
3.08
Erik Stokkebye
published 3.5
John Lineberger
published
Nelson Britt
published
Phillip Morgan
published
Spurgeon Mackie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MARK TERRIO + Giles Beal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erik Witten
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
3.5
Gary Covitz
38W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.72
3.5
MARK TERRIO
126W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Giles Beal
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Howard Epstein
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Erik Stokkebye
6W–17L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
John Lineberger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nelson Britt
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Phillip Morgan
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Spurgeon Mackie
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.