Teams

KHeidkamp (PCC)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs SChudgar (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanet Reynolds / Kristin Heidkamp vs Carol Davis / Donna Thompson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs NHaskins (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Heidkamp / Christine Leavitt vs Nikki Haskins / Kathryn Bartlett1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Stenersen / Janet Reynolds vs Elisa Salim / Anita Corum4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusie Fragale / Elizabeth Suppa vs Sophie Graham / Kelley Montroy0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Kristin Heidkamp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Christine Leavitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Charlotte Renner
published 3.5
3.17
Janet Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Nancy Stenersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Tonja Padgett
published 3.5
2.97
2.69
Elizabeth Suppa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Trina Blankenship
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Helen Daly
published
Stacy Figgs Sokhi
published
Susie Fragale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Heidkamp + Christine Leavitt8356% games−1.4% vs expected
Tonja Padgett + Lacey Johnson Boatman3244% gamesnot enough data
Christine Leavitt + Charlotte Renner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristin Heidkamp
89W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Christine Leavitt
68W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Charlotte Renner
24W–25L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Janet Reynolds
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Nancy Stenersen
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Tonja Padgett
42W–54L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Lacey Johnson Boatman
30W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Elizabeth Suppa
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Trina Blankenship
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.65
Helen Daly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacy Figgs Sokhi
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susie Fragale
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.