Teams

McMullen Halm

2024 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 M Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-22vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/40&Over3.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesChi Ming Yu / Paul Solorzano vs Cebron Walker / Ken Degen5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Alan Chin / Dustin Applebaum1-6, 3-6
2024-06-08vs Ardea BettencourtWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Patterson / Andrew DePasquale vs Gregg Stallwood / Terry Wehner6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-01vs Seminole Lake DsaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Chris Maddaloni / Tom Johnson6-4, 6-3
2024-05-18vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/40&Over3.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Joseph Flaherty vs Alan Chin / Max Collazo6-3, 6-4
2024-05-16vs Seminole Lake DsaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Jose Dsa / Chris Maddaloni6-4, 6-3
2024-05-11vs Ardea BettencourtWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Patterson / Andrew DePasquale vs Patrick LaLone / James Bettencourt5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-27vs Pinellas/Fantauzzo/40&Over3.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Alan Chin / Kevin Hennessy6-7, 1-6
2024-04-20vs Ardea BettencourtLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Patterson / Paul Solorzano vs Robert Hill / Terry Wehner3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Johnny Fung
published
3.48
3.45
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.43
Joseph Flaherty
published
3.30
Andrew DePasquale
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
3.24
YOUNES HAMDI
published
3.18
Daniel McKinney
published 3.5
3.00
Paul Solorzano
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kyle Robertshaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew DePasquale + Christopher Patterson5158% games+2.9% vs expected
Andrew DePasquale + Paul Solorzano191851% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johnny Fung
26W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.61
3.5
Edwin Alejandro-Vega
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Brandon Halm
26W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
Joseph Flaherty
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christopher Patterson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
YOUNES HAMDI
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Daniel McKinney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Paul Solorzano
69W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kyle Robertshaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.