← Teams

N OR-VTC-Archedon

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Tim Janes
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.22
Robert Piercy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Mister Archedon
published 3.5
3.05
Lee Wiegand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Steven Darling
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Charles Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.70
Jeff Sunshine
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.48
Robert Hillison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.34
Wesley Eader
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Results15 ties
2025-02-01Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Janes / Jeff Sunshine vs Michael Bucci / George Catto6-1, 6-2
2025-02-01Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Janes / Jeff Sunshine vs Dan Kerns / Curt Carmichael6-4, 6-4
2025-01-31Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Janes / Jeff Sunshine vs Joseph Porter / Barry Nazar5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-15Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRobert Piercy / Jeff Sunshine vs Ray Hisayasu / Matthew Berge6-3, 7-6
2024-09-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesRobert Piercy / Jeff Sunshine vs James Phillips / Robert Peters6-2, 6-3
2024-09-13Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCharles Stewart / Jeff Sunshine vs Malcolm Mano / James Jovanovich6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-12Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJeff Sunshine / Charles Stewart vs Stephen Allen / Barry Vedder6-2, 6-1
2024-05-09Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesWesley Eader / Robert Hillison vs Ed Kluss / Robert Hesslink7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTim Janes / Steven Darling vs William DelPlato / Victor Regner6-3, 6-1
2024-05-03Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesWesley Eader / Jeff Sunshine vs Victor Regner / Francisco Hevia1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-30Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesSteven Darling / Tim Janes vs Marvin Henry / Charles Martin6-0, 6-0
2024-04-25Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesTim Janes / Wesley Eader vs Tom Tsuruta / Craig Tompkins7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKen Bolton / Steven Darling vs Jeffrey Kaye / Feng-Yu Liu6-0, 6-0
2024-04-19Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKen Bolton / Tim Janes vs Dan Pope / Keibun Hayashi6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Merchel / Jeff Sunshine vs Arkadiy Boyarshinov / Jeffrey Kaye6-4, 6-2
2024-04-11Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesWesley Eader / Jeff Sunshine vs Dan Pope / Jeff Kennedy6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKen Bolton / Steven Darling vs Arkadiy Boyarshinov / Reza Kalantari6-3, 6-2
2024-03-26Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Piercy / Tim Janes vs Shootan Pirzadeh / Rex Smith6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWesley Eader / Steven Darling vs Tom Tsuruta / Craig Tompkins5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-14Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCharles Stewart / Jeff Sunshine vs Ed Kluss / Steve Snyder3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMister Archedon / Robert Hillison vs Allen VanLeuven / Charles Martin6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Tim Janes
47W–53L career
0%18%82%
3.23
3.5
Robert Piercy
88W–79L career
1%99%0%
3.22
3.5
Mister Archedon
108W–47L career
7%93%0%
3.12
3
Lee Wiegand
62W–61L career · type A
0%70%30%
3.05
3
Steven Darling
63W–87L career
0%99%1%
2.82
3
Charles Stewart
37W–61L career
7%87%6%
2.78
3
Jeff Sunshine
21W–22L career
6%93%1%
2.70
2.5
Robert Hillison
18W–8L career · type A
0%41%59%
2.48
2.5
Wesley Eader
55W–103L career · type A
0%79%21%
2.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.