Teams

4 Glen Allen Berens

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-05vs 3 Southampton LaneWon 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Berens / Hunter Harrell vs Laura Earley / Cherie Lane6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-08vs 5 Westwood Cecil/GentryWon 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Berens / Alexandra S Hakusui vs Elizabeth Kelly / Ashley Wright Henry6-1, 6-2
2021-05-01vs 3 Southampton LaneWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Lindsey Genter vs Ashley Hart / Christy Holt6-2, 6-0
2021-04-25vs 5 Westwood Cecil/GentryWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Megan Schwenk vs Courtney Greiner / Alicia Cecil6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-10vs 2 Willow Oaks BlackwoodWon 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Berens / Lindsey Genter vs Kim Alley / Kathryn Brotherton6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Jenny Murray
published
4.56
Kim Morrissett
published
4.54
Jennifer Grinnell
published
4.41
Logan Stone
published
4.41
Nicole Parker
published
4.39
Jackie Berens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.04
Ellen Meyer
published 4.5
3.89
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.56
Jill Campbell
published
Megan Schwenk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Morrissett + Jenny Murray213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny Murray
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
4.64
Kim Morrissett
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
4.56
Jennifer Grinnell
2W–14L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
4.54
Logan Stone
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
4.41
Nicole Parker
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Jackie Berens
89W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Ellen Meyer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.04
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
3.89
Jill Campbell
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.56
Megan Schwenk
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.