Teams

JLayne/NChristensen (Southampton)

2023 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-25vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Lisa O'Shea vs Jill Caldwell / Gayle Hoy6-1, 6-2
2023-09-18vs SMyers (PPRSC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDenise Lindner / Lisa O'Shea vs Kathleen Goessel / Kathryn Granger6-0, 6-1
2023-09-11vs TAmos/TLoughlin-Young (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesValerie Link / Melissa Chitu vs Tracy Amos / Marla Horvath6-3, 6-4
2023-08-30vs HGores/JNomina (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Julia Payne vs Jan Nomina / Ellen Carlisle7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-28vs SConnor (Providence County Club)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Wilson / Teri Iezzi vs Pam Richardson / Lisa Duggins4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Davis / Lisa O'Shea vs Barbara van Meerten / Laura Hendler6-2, 6-0
2023-08-14vs JSlep (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Davis / Valerie Link vs Wilma Pinter / Gillian Murrell3-6, 4-6
2023-08-07vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Julia Payne vs Dottie Boone / Lauren Stikeleather2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa O'Shea / Nancy Christensen vs Sharon Surrett / Gayle Hoy6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
W Kay Bridges
published
3.29
Melissa Chitu
published
3.15
Cindy Wilson
published 3
3.10
Teri Iezzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Julia Payne
published
2.99
Lisa O'Shea
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Valerie Link
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Denise Lindner
published 3
2.92
Patrice Forbes
published
2.89
Nancy Christensen
published
2.89
Janet Layne
published
2.85
Susie McCraney
published
Tracee Pearson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Iezzi + Lisa O'Shea314 matchesnot enough data
W Kay Bridges + Cindy Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

W Kay Bridges
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Melissa Chitu
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Cindy Wilson
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Teri Iezzi
110W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Julia Payne
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Lisa O'Shea
83W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Valerie Link
83W–97L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Denise Lindner
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Patrice Forbes
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
Nancy Christensen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Janet Layne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.89
Susie McCraney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Tracee Pearson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.