Teams

LCTA18/Tyner/Maybank

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-21vs LCTA18/Derstine/Doty ParkWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Gottshalk / Lance Tyner vs Brian Derstine / Marc Spears6-4, 6-0
2022-03-14vs LCTA18/Skoglund/CreeksideWon 10
W#2 SinglesLance Tyner vs Eric Betzhold4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-23vs LCTA18/Beck/CTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSashank Sakamuri / Lance Tyner vs Matthew Whipple / William Hutson6-2, 6-4
2022-02-14vs LCTA18/Smith-Lee/St AndrewsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSashank Sakamuri / Lance Tyner vs David Jacky / Robert Lee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-31vs LCTA18/Keiper/CTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSashank Sakamuri / Lance Tyner vs William Keiper / Bradley Harrison4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Donzell Bailey
published 4
4.00
John Gottshalk
published
3.59
John David Pfile
published
3.22
Lance Tyner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Charles Truluck
published 3.5
3.05
Jamie Deveaux
published 3.5
2.97
Paul Callander
published
Jeffrey Shealy
published
Paul Baran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Deveaux + Paul Callander4354% games−1.9% vs expected
Charles Truluck + Jamie Deveaux211254% games−2.7% vs expected
Charles Truluck + Paul Callander6645% games−3.9% vs expected
Paul Baran + John David Pfile3545% gamesnot enough data
Lance Tyner + Charles Truluck4258% gamesnot enough data
Lance Tyner + John David Pfile3256% gamesnot enough data
John David Pfile + John Gottshalk2348% gamesnot enough data
Lance Tyner + Paul Baran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donzell Bailey
23W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
4.02
John Gottshalk
78W–49L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
John David Pfile
120W–64L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Lance Tyner
284W–198L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Charles Truluck
58W–34L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jamie Deveaux
31W–21L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Paul Callander
22W–36L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jeffrey Shealy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Baran
28W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.