Teams

STIENE

2026 USTA MXD Adult 18 & Over Dec 27-Jan 4 · 3.0 MIXED 18 (Draw Filled Limit 2 Teams)

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-01-03vs BRACKETT 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Kaiser / Christopher Lopez vs Tiffany Millan / Vik Saini2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Stiene / Madalyn Atherton vs Laura Jones / Christopher Jones2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Vinson / Alexander Indihar vs Madison Chambliss / Jeremy Mellott7-5, 6-3
2026-01-02vs BRACKETT 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexander Indihar / Allison Beason vs Daniel He / Madison Chambliss3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Carson / Daniel Burris vs Maranatha Brackett / Hudson Morris0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Stiene / Melissa Kaiser vs Jeremy Mellott / Tiffany Millan3-6, 1-6
2026-01-01vs BRACKETT 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKenny Johnson / Allison Beason vs Hudson Morris / Laura Jones2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMadalyn Atherton / Christopher Lopez vs Angelique Johnson / Vik Saini3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Bryant / Beth Bryant vs Isaac Cohen / Rebekah Williams4-6, 1-6
2025-12-31vs BRACKETT 3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKyle Bryant / Katherine Vinson vs Christopher Jones / Laura Jones6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Burris / Madalyn Atherton vs Daniel He / Angelique Johnson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Carson / Christopher Lopez vs Jeremy Mellott / Jill Mellott0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-12-30vs BRACKETT 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJC Lima / Katherine Vinson vs Vik Saini / Rebekah Williams1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Kaiser / Kenny Johnson vs Isaac Cohen / Madison Chambliss1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Bryant / Beth Bryant vs Jeremy Mellott / Jill Mellott4-6, 4-6
2025-12-28vs BRACKETT 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrandon Stiene / Beth Bryant vs Tiffany Millan / Hudson Morris1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlexander Indihar / Kimberly Carson vs Madison Chambliss / Daniel He4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Burris / Katherine Vinson vs Rebekah Williams / Isaac Cohen1-6, 3-6
2025-12-27vs BRACKETT 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandon Stiene / Allison Beason vs Daniel He / Angelique Johnson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Bryant / Beth Bryant vs Hudson Morris / Tiffany Millan3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKenny Johnson / Katherine Vinson vs Gerald Brackett / Maranatha Brackett6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 MIXED 18 (Draw Filled Limit 2 Teams)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BRACKETT 3.0701838125
2STIENE0731838246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Alexander Indihar
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
JC Lima
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Katherine Vinson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.74
Christopher Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Kenny Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Allison Beason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Brandon Stiene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Kyle Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Madalyn Atherton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Daniel Burris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Kimberly Carson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Priscila Rodas
published
2.27
Melissa Kaiser
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscila Rodas + Melissa Kaiser123 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Kaiser + Madalyn Atherton303 matchesnot enough data
Alexander Indihar + JC Lima213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexander Indihar
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
JC Lima
9W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Katherine Vinson
29W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Christopher Lopez
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Kenny Johnson
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Allison Beason
13W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brandon Stiene
18W–28L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
Kyle Bryant
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Madalyn Atherton
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.66
3
Daniel Burris
2W–11L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Kimberly Carson
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Priscila Rodas
36W–50L career · no lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Melissa Kaiser
37W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.