Teams

Er.Wynia18S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-04vs Sa.Truitt18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Wynia vs Hilary Tew4-6, 1-6
2025-10-21vs Le.Wright18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Claire Limon7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Carrie Russell6-4, 6-2
2025-10-14vs Le.Wright18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Wynia vs Claire Limon3-6, 1-6
2025-09-16vs Sa.Truitt18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Sandra Truitt6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Michaela DeSoucey6-1, 6-1
2025-09-09vs Le.Wright18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Caroline Wright3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Carrie Russell6-0, 6-4
2025-08-26vs Sa.Truitt18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSydney Chick vs Hilary Tew6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCary Armstrong vs Christine Bass6-2, 6-1
2025-08-19Won 10
W#2 SinglesSydney Chick vs Leslie Wright6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Cary Armstrong
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
published
3.64
Sydney Chick
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Anna Kooper
published 3.5
3.46
Meimei Wessinger
published
3.41
Valerie Wallace
published
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Katherine King
published
3.27
Vanessa Garrido
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine King + Vanessa Garrido314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cary Armstrong
97W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Sydney Chick
50W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Anna Kooper
25W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Meimei Wessinger
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Valerie Wallace
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–126L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Katherine King
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Vanessa Garrido
67W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.