Teams

LVTA ORANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs FCCC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAdam Less / Brian Smith vs Matthew Hoeven / Mark Orr6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJared Habein / Eric Sorensen vs Paul Gronewoller / Peter Corran7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-27vs HMTC PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Jared Petersen vs Chet Reistad / Kendal Sanders3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Less / Eric Sorensen vs Steven Tucker / Kim Devoe6-3, 6-2
2023-05-26vs MLF NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Flanigan / Dennis Flanigan vs Nicholas Roe / Aaron Phillips6-4, 6-2
2023-05-17vs LVTA SILVERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Sorensen / Adam Less vs Cory Lynch / Jason Summers2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJared Habein / Kenneth Keller vs Alan Krech / Scott Kunze7-5, 6-4
2023-05-03vs HMTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesDennis Flanigan / Mark Flanigan vs Matt Badger / Richard Penhale1-6, 1-6
2023-04-26vs CSU GOLDWon 20
W#2 DoublesMark Flanigan / Dennis Flanigan vs David Baird / Federico Pardina6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrian Petersen / Jared Habein vs Brad Biggerstaff / Kelley Axe6-4, 6-4
2023-04-19vs TAG MAROONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Less / Brian Smith vs Matthew Martinez / Robin Wick7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJared Habein / Dave Rizzotto vs Ben Struzenberg / Chuck Bridges6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Josh Achtemeier
published
3.88
Adam Less
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Jared Petersen
published
3.70
Mark Flanigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Dennis Flanigan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Kenneth Keller
published
3.43
Jared Habein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Eric Sorensen
published
Wesley Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Flanigan + Dennis Flanigan15557% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Flanigan + Adam Less6257% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Flanigan + Kenneth Keller033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Achtemeier
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Adam Less
76W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jared Petersen
19W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Mark Flanigan
70W–62L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.70
4
Dennis Flanigan
52W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kenneth Keller
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Jared Habein
48W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
Eric Sorensen
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
Wesley Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.