Teams

Casually Courting

2026 One Doubles · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-04vs Rally & RoseLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Gottlieb / Wendy Wolf vs Karissa Ditgen / Lora Lord0-6, 1-6
2026-07-28vs Fun Flex 26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Wolf / Katy Wroblewski vs Lilia Boyer / Ingrid Petersen6-7, 2-6
2026-07-25vs WHRC-Hinton/SahuLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Anderson / Lauren Fiala vs Katie Lee / Anca Tudorache6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-21vs Sebastian/BuchananLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatalin Wiggins / Lauren Fiala vs Philberta Leung / Cory Sebastian1-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs Neal/GoetzLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaty Wroblewski / Holly Gottlieb vs Richelle Neal / Emily Goetz3-6, 3-6
2026-07-07vs NOR-YooLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatalin Wiggins / Wendy Wolf vs Carrie Jones / Saerom Yoo0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-27vs Stielstra-OfuasiaLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Wolf / Katalin Wiggins vs Lilian Tsi Stielstra / kari hart2-6, 2-6
2026-06-15vs Grabe-SommerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatalin Wiggins / Erika Anderson vs Kimi Owens / Sarah Grabe6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Erika Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Wendy Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.99
Katalin Wiggins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.90
Holly Gottlieb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.75
Lauren Fiala
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.74
Katy Wroblewski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Gottlieb + Katy Wroblewski0725% games−7.2% vs expected
Lauren Fiala + Katalin Wiggins0519% games−17.9% vs expected
Erika Anderson + Holly Gottlieb123 matchesnot enough data
Erika Anderson + Katalin Wiggins213 matchesnot enough data
Holly Gottlieb + Lauren Fiala033 matchesnot enough data
Holly Gottlieb + Katalin Wiggins033 matchesnot enough data
Katalin Wiggins + Wendy Wolf033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Erika Anderson
26W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.71
2.5
Wendy Wolf
6W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Katalin Wiggins
7W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Holly Gottlieb
3W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
2.5
Lauren Fiala
0W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.75
2.5
Katy Wroblewski
1W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.