← Teams

SJRC-Haas

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.69 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Zach Bergthold
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Michael Arellano
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Julian Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Tina Farrelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Stephanie Haas
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Peter Farrelly
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Rob Laing
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Kimberly Stockstad
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-12-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Haas / Julian Miller vs Heike Droste / Hien Lu6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusha Pratt / Peter Farrelly vs Hoover Li / Patty Chen7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Chong / Michael Arellano vs Laurie Horenstein / PHAT Lee6-3, 6-2
2019-11-10Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKourtnie Katayama / Zach Bergthold vs Jennifer Bane / Shaoping Lin6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Rob Laing vs Brad Shafer / Norine Nelson Martin6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKatie Chong / Michael Arellano vs Natalya Ramras / Andrew Thorburn6-1, 6-2
2019-10-27Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTina Farrelly / Michael Arellano vs George Riley / Irene Feldun6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Rob Laing vs Bob Towne / Jaymie Towne4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Haas / Michael Schroeder vs Robin Burak / Kevin Muck6-4, 6-3
2019-10-20Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTina Farrelly / Peter Farrelly vs Carly Vendegna / Albert Hensley6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKourtnie Katayama / Zach Bergthold vs Michele Sutherland / Jason Moore-Greenke6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKatie Chong / Rob Laing vs Ariana White / Zac Carlson6-1, 6-3
2019-10-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKimberly Stockstad / Rob Laing vs Ellen Pearson / Masafumi Inoue6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKourtnie Katayama / Zach Bergthold vs Joyce Wang / Jian Zeng6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesStephanie Haas / Michael Schroeder vs Morganne Hatfield / Jonathan Hong6-4, 6-2
2019-10-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Haas / Julian Miller vs Susan Suttich / Steve Suttich6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTina Farrelly / Peter Farrelly vs Ann-Marie Lundberg / Martin Wells6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusha Pratt / Michael Arellano vs Judi Babcock / D Michael Jones6-1, 6-4
2019-09-27Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesStephanie Haas / Julian Miller vs Rob Chandler / Deborah Naugler6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Farrelly / Peter Farrelly vs Steve Harris / Heather Selis6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKourtnie Katayama / Zach Bergthold vs James Lang / Traci Laurent3-0
2019-09-21Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJulian Miller / Stephanie Haas vs Vimal Natarajan / Weizhen Guo0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRob Laing / Kimberly Stockstad vs Shawn Boyce / Lyann Nguyen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesZach Bergthold / Kourtnie Katayama vs Craig Walker / Laura Rundle7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Zach Bergthold
40W–47L career
0%98%1%
3.80
4
Michael Arellano
29W–12L career
not enough data
—
4
Julian Miller
42W–28L career
5%93%2%
3.75
4
Tina Farrelly
115W–45L career
14%86%0%
3.58
3.5
Stephanie Haas
66W–82L career
0%98%2%
3.36
3.5
Peter Farrelly
42W–55L career
0%97%3%
3.34
3.5
Rob Laing
29W–53L career
7%93%0%
3.14
3
Kimberly Stockstad
18W–38L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.