Teams

Westwood-Henry

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-02-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Seth Nelson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-18vs Hermitage-Berens 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Byron Balkin vs John Snead / Kathleen Crotty7-6, 6-2
2024-02-11vs MAC-BarefootLost 01
L#3 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Joseph Brown vs Ellen Meyer / Logan Gruhl3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-02-04vs ACAC-HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Byron Balkin vs Kim Alley / Ben Hall6-4, 6-3
2024-01-27vs Salisbury-RiehmWon 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Seth Nelson vs Drew Lineberger / Lauren Palmer6-3, 6-4
2024-01-21vs Raintree-SinsabaughWon 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Seth Feibelman vs Doug Bond / Janice McGarity6-3, 7-5
2024-01-14vs CCV-GenRahWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Byron Balkin vs David Lefkowitz / Elizabeth Wallace6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Clara Laing
published 5
4.64
Ashley Schmitz
published 5
4.58
Joseph Brown
published
4.51
Seth Feibelman
published
4.43
Kevin Calhoun
published
4.34
Robert Quinn
published
4.28
Elizabeth Kelly
published 4.5
Anna Shea
published 4.5
4.25
Cary Moore
published 4.5
4.23
Todd Prince
published
4.23
Ryan Baker
published
4.21
Richard Godsey
published
4.02
Becky Oatts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.67
Lauren Jones
published
3.51
Ashley Wright Henry
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Seth Feibelman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.83
5
Ashley Schmitz
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
4.64
Joseph Brown
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.58
Seth Feibelman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.51
Kevin Calhoun
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
4.43
Robert Quinn
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–23L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Cary Moore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
Todd Prince
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Ryan Baker
29W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
Richard Godsey
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Becky Oatts
57W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Lauren Jones
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ashley Wright Henry
47W–51L career · 7 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.