Teams

Unassigned Playeres - Spring

2022 Unassigned Players-GC · Unassigned Players

21 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Unassigned Players have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Wes Steiner
published
3.86
Savannah Steiner
published
3.84
Kathleen Marlowe
published
3.68
Amy Murray
published 4
3.25
Yvette Weeks
published
3.25
Mary Sukiennik
published
3.20
Kevin Fish
published
3.16
Vona Wawryszczuk
published
2.83
Jay Osman
published
2.58
Bubba Newman
published 3
2.39
Janet Blythe
published
2.14
Billie Macnaughton
published 2.5
Jane Magee
published
Kathryn Plott
published
Mark McQueen
published
Michelle Savoy
published
Paul Benigno
published
Risa Schultz
published
Stephanie Dohner
published
Temple Steenkamp
published
Warren Steenkamp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Blythe + Billie Macnaughton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wes Steiner
41W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Savannah Steiner
25W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Kathleen Marlowe
46W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Amy Murray
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Yvette Weeks
28W–20L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Mary Sukiennik
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Kevin Fish
33W–43L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Vona Wawryszczuk
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Jay Osman
31W–58L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Bubba Newman
10W–45L career · type A · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Janet Blythe
29W–31L career · no lines in 2022
0%81%19%
2.39
2.5
Billie Macnaughton
17W–44L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Jane Magee
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathryn Plott
31W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark McQueen
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Savoy
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Benigno
30W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Risa Schultz
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Dohner
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Temple Steenkamp
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Warren Steenkamp
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.