Teams

V - Las Posas Highballs

2023 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura WE · V - Women 3.0 WE

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-04vs V - North Ranch Jolly RanchersWon 10
W#3 DoublesFelicula Tovar / Penny Teague vs Wendy Greenberg / Caroline Yablans6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFelicula Tovar / Maria Wascher vs Melissa Wallace / Pamela Hellenbrand0-6, 1-6
2023-02-11vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Howey / Beverly Torres vs Olivia Overton / Anne Renard6-1, 6-0
2023-01-28vs V - Sunset AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Howey / Beverly Torres vs Catherine Loubier / Lydia Davila7-6, 6-1
2023-01-22vs V - Royal GirlfriendsLost 02
L#1 DoublesFelicula Tovar / Karen Root vs Marilyn Germann / Kathryn Pisaro5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGina Howey / Candy Edwards vs Jennifer House / Barb Jepson2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Lisa ONeil
published
2.89
Maureen Finnigan
published
2.84
Beverly Torres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Gina Howey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Felicula Tovar
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Candy Edwards
published 3
2.63
Karen Root
published
2.60
Carol Pollock
published 3
2.54
Catalina Wise
published 3
2.51
Keri Kettle
published
2.51
Susan Custance
published
2.51
J Chen
published
2.27
Penny Teague
published
Wendy Spasiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Torres + Gina Howey11852% games+5.2% vs expected
Maureen Finnigan + Beverly Torres5159% games+5.1% vs expected
Maureen Finnigan + Gina Howey4156% gamesnot enough data
Felicula Tovar + Maureen Finnigan303 matchesnot enough data
Felicula Tovar + Beverly Torres213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa ONeil
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
2.89
Maureen Finnigan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Beverly Torres
34W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Felicula Tovar
32W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Candy Edwards
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Karen Root
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Catalina Wise
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54
Keri Kettle
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
J Chen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
2.51
Penny Teague
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
Wendy Spasiano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.