Teams

LCTA (C) 4.0-3.0M 55 & Over (Lee)

USTA 55 & Over Tri Level · 55 & Over 4.0-3.5-3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · 55 & Over 4.0-3.5-3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA (A) 4.0-3.0M 55 & Over (Keiper)000000
2LCTA (B) 4.0-3.0M 55 & Over (Fellabom)000000
3LCTA (C) 4.0-3.0M 55 & Over (Lee)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Claudio Carrara
published 4
3.74
Michael Hauser
published
3.62
Jay Meyer
published
3.54
Bobby Meadows
published 3.5
3.53
Tony Wespy
published
Frank Leonard
published 3.5
3.01
Webster Parker
published
3.00
Bruce Etheridge
published 3
2.92
Brian Tallmadge
published 3
2.86
Jeffrey Triphahn
published
2.83
James Altzner
published 3
2.77
Andrew Leone
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hauser + Jay Meyer5159% games+5.2% vs expected
Michael Hauser + Claudio Carrara7066% games+4.5% vs expected
Bruce Etheridge + Brian Tallmadge7259% games+0.6% vs expected
Bobby Meadows + Frank Leonard9461% games+0.3% vs expected
James Altzner + Jeffrey Triphahn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claudio Carrara
103W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Michael Hauser
134W–60L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Jay Meyer
48W–32L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Bobby Meadows
60W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Tony Wespy
40W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Frank Leonard
27W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Webster Parker
18W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Bruce Etheridge
89W–52L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Brian Tallmadge
48W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jeffrey Triphahn
19W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
James Altzner
20W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Andrew Leone
34W–28L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.