Teams

Miller/Tyler

2025 Neb. Mixed 18&Over · 9.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs O'Shea/ IbrahimovaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Hammer / Ashley Tyler vs Grady Works / Cecilia Ulrich2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Strasburger / Crystal B Craft vs Camilla Ibrahimova / Samuel Johnson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMikaela Hanson / Eric Hanson vs Nick OShea / Elizabeth Hain5-7, 3-6
2025-08-05vs Lubben/FreemanLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Hanson / Sophie Miller vs Julie Obear / Joseph Bucknell0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLainie Fanton / Matthew Strasburger vs Tyler Lubben / Katie Garcia7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKate Dean / Lincoln Chamberlin vs Mike Garcia / Alexandra Rieke6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-30vs Lubben/FreemanLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Lisec-Talarico / Conner Works vs Elizabeth Garcia / Justin Brinkman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesScotty Sullivan / Crystal B Craft vs Tyler Lubben / Katie Garcia2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSophie Miller / Alec Lubben vs Christopher Freeman / Herita Akamah2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-07-27vs TeglerLost 03
L#1 DoublesConner Works / Lainie Fanton vs Kyle Givens / Kari Stempson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCrystal B Craft / Eric Hanson vs Tammy Tegler / Talor Wain2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScotty Sullivan / Mikaela Hanson vs Zachary Tegler / Gibsen Chapman2-6, 2-6
2025-07-11vs O'Shea/ IbrahimovaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Tyler / Andrew Hammer vs Grady Works / Cecilia Ulrich6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLincoln Chamberlin / Michelle Lisec-Talarico vs Camilla Ibrahimova / Samuel Johnson6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKate Dean / Matthew Strasburger vs Clare Plachy / Blake Benson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-29vs TeglerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLainie Fanton / Eric Hanson vs Tammy Tegler / Talor Wain2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSophie Miller / Scotty Sullivan vs Zachary Tegler / Gibsen Chapman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Tyler / Andrew Hammer vs Garin Leehy / Kari Stempson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 9.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1O'Shea/ Ibrahimova5114413148
2NEWC/Johnson/18&Over/9.0X4212616158
3Lubben/Freeman4212616136
4NE/Redding/Petersen/18&Over/9.0X4211717153
5Vineyard339920187
6Lowe1541431197
7Miller/Tyler1521634203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Hammer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.30
Crystal B Craft
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Eric Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Kate Dean
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.24
Lainie Fanton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Sophie Miller
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Michelle Lisec-Talarico
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Scotty Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Mikaela Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alec Lubben
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Ashley Tyler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Conner Works
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lincoln Chamberlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Strasburger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alec Lubben + Sophie Miller3449% games−6.3% vs expected
Ashley Tyler + Lincoln Chamberlin134 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Tyler + Andrew Hammer123 matchesnot enough data
Scotty Sullivan + Michelle Lisec-Talarico033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Hammer
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Crystal B Craft
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Eric Hanson
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Kate Dean
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lainie Fanton
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Sophie Miller
54W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
Michelle Lisec-Talarico
48W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Scotty Sullivan
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Mikaela Hanson
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Alec Lubben
43W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Ashley Tyler
31W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Conner Works
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lincoln Chamberlin
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Strasburger
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.