Teams

Schneiderman 55s 6.5 Combo M Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Men 55 Thurs

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-18vs Arfeen 55s 6.5 Combo M Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesTimothy Shantry / Steve Guild vs Tanvir Chodri / Toni Rodriguez4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTom Barringer / Danny Finnegan vs A. Kobi-Jackson / Stephen Moore1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLee Schneiderman / Scott Bartels vs Vince Credle / Peter O'Connell7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesTimothy Shantry / Danny Finnegan vs Roy Malac / ALEX GRINKIN6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMitch White / Pat Hogan vs Glenn Gorman / John Dutton5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTom Barringer / Scott Bartels vs Kevin Blackman / George Vamvakas6-1, 6-4
2025-08-07vs Arfeen 55s 6.5 Combo M Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Guild / Tom Barringer vs Stephen Moore / Toni Rodriguez5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPat Hogan / Jeff Shue vs Syed Arfeen / Tanvir Chodri6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarl Boggis / Scott Bartels vs Dennis Stearns / A. Kobi-Jackson5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men 55 Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Mitch White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Timothy Shantry
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Carl Boggis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Tom Barringer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Jeff Shue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Lee Schneiderman
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.10
Paul Steimle
published
2.97
Pat Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Steve Guild
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Danny Finnegan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
James Beardsley
published 3
2.72
Scott Bartels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Hogan + Steve Guild5152% games−8.7% vs expected
Danny Finnegan + Scott Bartels134 matchesnot enough data
Danny Finnegan + Steve Guild314 matchesnot enough data
Tom Barringer + Lee Schneiderman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mitch White
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Timothy Shantry
22W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Carl Boggis
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Barringer
15W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Jeff Shue
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Lee Schneiderman
18W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Paul Steimle
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Pat Hogan
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Steve Guild
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Danny Finnegan
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
James Beardsley
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Bartels
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.