Teams

OC Fullerton TC - Noemi -10

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.0W

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-11vs OC Dana Hills TC - SandyLost 01
L#2 DoublesWanda Shimazu / Sheri Kumsakul vs Annette Eckhardt / Stephanie Sunderman6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesHelen Ma / Sheri Kumsakul vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-21vs OC-LLW-Coto De Caza - 830Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Gordon / Patti Schlener vs Kristina Hellinga / Lynda Sims7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKarin Altonaga / Sayaka Han vs Tina O'Rourke / Irene Suber0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCamille Jung / Joyce Zhu vs Nicole Miranda / Sherry Harley3-6, 1-6
2025-03-04vs OC T3 Tennis @JSerra - ReneeLost 01
L#2 DoublesJosephine Chow / Lisa Wiehebrink vs Miranda Taft / Renee Gershenson5-7, 4-6
2025-02-21vs OC HB @THC - RosetteWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoemi Rodriguez / Josephine Chow vs Terri Cain / Michelle Schmit7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-31vs OC Racquet Club of Irvine - BrittLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosephine Chow / Noemi Rodriguez vs Aydee Paredes / Georgina Rojas2-6, 3-6
2025-01-17vs OC Lifetime RSC - JeanetteLost 01
L#1 SinglesJosephine Chow vs Kelley Birmingham0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Janell Aven
published
3.12
Noemi Rodriguez
published
3.05
Sheri Kumsakul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Robin Briggs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Joyce Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Karen Tonelli
published
Camille Jung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Cheryl Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Helen Ma
published 3
2.63
Josephine Chow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Lisa Wiehebrink
published
2.60
Wanda Shimazu
published
2.58
Patti Schlener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Karin Altonaga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Masako Sato
published
Sayaka Han
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Ingle
published
Zulema Banados
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wanda Shimazu + Robin Briggs1434% games−10.9% vs expected
Cheryl Gordon + Patti Schlener1439% gamesnot enough data
Patti Schlener + Lisa Wiehebrink2345% gamesnot enough data
Josephine Chow + Helen Ma044 matchesnot enough data
Josephine Chow + Sheri Kumsakul224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janell Aven
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Noemi Rodriguez
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Sheri Kumsakul
38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Robin Briggs
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Joyce Zhu
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Karen Tonelli
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Camille Jung
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Cheryl Gordon
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Helen Ma
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Josephine Chow
145W–300L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
Lisa Wiehebrink
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.60
Wanda Shimazu
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Patti Schlener
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Karin Altonaga
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Masako Sato
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sayaka Han
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Ingle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zulema Banados
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.