Teams

MCC Baddies

2025 Fall Adult League · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-21vs Wailea Surf AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Falk / Sabrina Jardine vs Darlene Haslam / Leslie Wilshusen4-6, 1-6
2025-12-14vs Baseline BellesLost 03
L#1 DoublesSabrina Jardine / Chihwa Tang vs Rachel Kofron / Jennifer Kelley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllison Kermode vs Natalie Plotkin3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Davis / Melanie Devereux vs Erika Varcak / Melissa Padillla1-6, 5-7
2025-12-07vs Baseline BellesWon 10
W#2 DoublesChihwa Tang / Melanie Devereux vs Laurel Falit / Jennifer Kelley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-12-06vs Wailea Surf AcesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSabrina Jardine vs Elina Hartkopf7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Kermode / Lisa Paulson vs Darlene Haslam / Leslie Wilshusen2-6, 1-6
2025-12-05vs Baseline BellesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAllison Kermode vs Erika Varcak6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Falk / Sabrina Jardine vs Elizabeth Lofaro / Melissa Padillla6-3, 6-4
2025-11-23vs Wailea Surf AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesSabrina Jardine / Chihwa Tang vs Gaela Prince / Shara Wolfe0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Davis / Allison Kermode vs Janet Daly / Kelley Holtman0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Kandy Grantz
published 4
3.30
Niki Cumming
published
3.21
Alexandra Falk
published 3.5
3.11
Mindy Armour
published
3.03
Sabrina Jardine
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.03
Janet Davis
published
3.02
Chihwa Tang
published 3
2.84
Melanie Devereux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Allison Kermode
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Lisa Paulson
published
Nicole Gonzales
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Davis + Lisa Paulson134 matchesnot enough data
Allison Kermode + Lisa Paulson404 matchesnot enough data
Kandy Grantz + Melanie Devereux033 matchesnot enough data
Allison Kermode + Melanie Devereux213 matchesnot enough data
Chihwa Tang + Niki Cumming123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kandy Grantz
76W–64L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Niki Cumming
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Alexandra Falk
2W–6L career · type D · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Mindy Armour
17W–40L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Sabrina Jardine
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Janet Davis
37W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
3
Chihwa Tang
62W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Melanie Devereux
67W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Allison Kermode
29W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Lisa Paulson
27W–54L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Gonzales
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.