Teams

GR NAVY

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-31vs BM GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Grange / Jonathan Hammond vs Kiley Mack / Ian Brown3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Markle vs Daniel Armstrong0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Brunet / Trevor Goff vs Gary Farmar / John Cimbura1-6, 2-6
2026-08-24vs KC-CC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Grange / Nick Lauters vs Damon Cable / Jason Wolfe0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPaul Mchenry vs Jake Cerra6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJonathan Hammond / Trevor Goff vs Blake Adams / McCory James1-6, 1-6
2026-08-17vs PH BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Grange / Jonathan Hammond vs Ross Jones / Kevin Bearley0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Brunet / Trevor Goff vs Thomas Reynolds / Brian Kinnear0-6, 1-6
2026-08-10vs CCC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesNick Lauters / Paul Mchenry vs Ben Volok / Mike Miller1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGeorge Brunet vs Jake Killgore0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTrevor Goff / Jeffrey Markle vs James Berguson / Craig Myles1-6, 4-6
2026-08-03vs MC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Grange / Jonathan Hammond vs Chris Nielsen / Austin Menendez0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDarin Brazel vs Augusto Jose Rodrigo del Castillo0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Markle / George Brunet vs Eric Wilfong / Cole Schorr2-6, 3-6
2026-07-27vs BCST BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Grange / Nick Lauters vs Mark Brown / Steve Monroe6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJonathan Hammond vs Roger Williams2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Brunet / Paul Mchenry vs James Barwick / Joe Kroog7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-20vs KC-RH BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Markle / Nick Lauters vs Matthew Fagan / Roger Torres0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPaul Mchenry vs Rob Pine6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDarin Brazel / Daniel Grange vs Mark Garcia / Marcus Garcia1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Paul Mchenry
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Nick Lauters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
George Brunet
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.47
Jonathan Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.46
Jeffrey Markle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.38
Daniel Grange
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.37
Trevor Goff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Darin Brazel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Grange + Jonathan Hammond033 matchesnot enough data
Darin Brazel + Trevor Goff033 matchesnot enough data
Trevor Goff + George Brunet033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Mchenry
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Nick Lauters
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
George Brunet
1W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Jonathan Hammond
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
Jeffrey Markle
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Daniel Grange
1W–16L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.38
Trevor Goff
0W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Darin Brazel
0W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.