Teams

USTA Atlanta/Laurie Schmidt

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 55 & Over Women · 9.0 Combined

12 players · average NTRP 4.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesJodie Kappers / Amy Means vs Sue Leffler / Jane McNeil6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMartha Fair / Wynell Daniel vs Jenifer Childress / Tracy Hobbs1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKay Moody / Laurie Schmidt vs Tracey Settlage / Jill Coco4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTammy Johnston / Penny Walton vs Tracy Hobbs / Sue Leffler6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWynell Daniel / Martha Fair vs Jenifer Childress / Jill Coco7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJodie Kappers / Laurie Schmidt vs Mitzi Roeser / Tracey Settlage6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAmy Means / Penny Walton vs Tracy Hobbs / Paula Kelly6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammy Johnston / Jodie Kappers vs Jenifer Childress / Jill Coco6-7, 6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVeronica O'Brien / Kay Moody vs Marcy Hirshberg / Mitzi Roeser6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTammy Johnston / Penny Walton vs Paula Kelly / Sue Leffler3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesVeronica O'Brien / Jodie Kappers vs Jenifer Childress / Jane McNeil6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Fair / Cathy Niemi vs Jill Coco / Mitzi Roeser6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesTammy Johnston / Penny Walton vs Paula Kelly / Sue Leffler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJodie Kappers / Cathy Niemi vs Jill Coco / Marcy Hirshberg5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Fair / Lynn Johns vs Jenifer Childress / Tracy Hobbs7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Combined have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Veronica O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.63
Amy Means
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.36
Judy Squires
published
4.36
Martha Fair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.35
Cathy Niemi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.33
Jodie Kappers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.26
Lynn Johns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Tammy Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.18
Penny Walton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Laurie Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Kay Moody
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Wynell Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Walton + Tammy Johnston6256% games+9.9% vs expected
Lynn Johns + Jodie Kappers8159% games+5.8% vs expected
Penny Walton + Amy Means10066% games+5.5% vs expected
Jodie Kappers + Laurie Schmidt12753% games+3.1% vs expected
Cathy Niemi + Judy Squires10556% games−0.1% vs expected
Martha Fair + Jodie Kappers3448% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronica O'Brien
59W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
4.69
5
Amy Means
24W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Judy Squires
34W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.36
Martha Fair
30W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.36
4.5
Cathy Niemi
42W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
Jodie Kappers
46W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Tammy Johnston
56W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
Penny Walton
53W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Laurie Schmidt
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
Kay Moody
112W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Wynell Daniel
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.