Teams

LI: Long Beach, Malik/Siddiqui

2022 Tri Level Men 4.5 · 4.5,4.0,3.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.36 / LONG ISLAND REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-11vs Blue Point, SubjectWon 21
L#1 DoublesDillon McKenzie / Amani Siddiqui vs James Carpenter / Casey Schnabel1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdwin Mulhern / Ryan Hendel vs Michael Casamassima / Brian Dulberg6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTyrone Bass / Matthew Freeman vs Jim Byrne / Steve Subject6-2, 6-4
2022-12-04vs Robbie Wagner, ShinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Cornelius / Eddie Demirci vs Samir Singh / Intekhab Khan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarlos Suarez / Mauro Martino vs Mingda Jiang / Jaewon Lee6-1, 6-2
2022-11-22vs Long Beach, SiddiquiWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmani Siddiqui / Michael Cornelius vs Zane Siddiqui / Faran Nazir6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRyan Hendel / Edwin Mulhern vs Mikayel Ayvazyan / Brian Heinze6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Freeman / Carlos Suarez vs David Leach / Jordan Klausner6-0, 6-0
2022-11-11vs Carefree, JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Cornelius / Dillon McKenzie vs Shuming Teoh / John Ferrari6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEdwin Mulhern / Ryan Hendel vs David Rafiy / Benjamin Zaslav7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarlos Suarez / Matthew Freeman vs Sam Ibrahim / Lawrence Ham7-5, 6-2
2022-10-29vs Blue Point, SubjectLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Cornelius / Mitchell Low vs David Cooper / Alex Wellems6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Freeman / Edwin Mulhern vs Michael Casamassima / Jonathan Nelson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Suarez / Mauro Martino vs Jim Byrne / Steve Subject4-6, 1-6
2022-10-23vs Robbie Wagner, ShinWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmani Siddiqui / Michael Cornelius vs Inhong Kim / Min Chul Jung6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdwin Mulhern / Ryan Hendel vs Noriyuki Kawai / Chris Yhun6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMauro Martino / Tyrone Bass vs Byron O'Neill / Mingda Jiang6-1, 6-1
2022-10-16vs Long Beach, SiddiquiWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmani Siddiqui / Dillon McKenzie vs Naeem Siddiqui / Faran Nazir6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRyan Hendel / MALIK BASS vs Zane Siddiqui / Sean Chhugani7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Freeman / Carlos Suarez vs Mark Weinberger / Jordan Klausner6-3, 6-2
2022-10-09vs Carefree, JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmani Siddiqui / Dillon McKenzie vs John Ferrari / Dan Jones6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdwin Mulhern / Ryan Hendel vs David Rafiy / Ian Epstein6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarlos Suarez / Matthew Freeman vs Benjamin Zaslav / Ash Pahuja6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5,4.0,3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Amani Siddiqui
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.78
Michael Cornelius
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.74
Dillon McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.40
Ryan Hendel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Mitchell Low
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Fayez Malik
published 4.5
3.83
Eddie Demirci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Edwin Mulhern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Matthew Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.36
Carlos Suarez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Mauro Martino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Aaron Loewen
published
MALIK BASS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tyrone Bass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yaakov Buff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyrone Bass + Matthew Freeman7066% games+16.4% vs expected
Carlos Suarez + Matthew Freeman6075% games+14.5% vs expected
Tyrone Bass + Mauro Martino5463% games+14.4% vs expected
Edwin Mulhern + Ryan Hendel5066% games+10.0% vs expected
Mitchell Low + Matthew Freeman3352% games+8.3% vs expected
Amani Siddiqui + Dillon McKenzie9464% games+8.1% vs expected
Dillon McKenzie + Michael Cornelius8256% games−0.0% vs expected
Mitchell Low + Michael Cornelius404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amani Siddiqui
111W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.80
Michael Cornelius
78W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.78
5
Dillon McKenzie
128W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.74
Ryan Hendel
24W–8L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Mitchell Low
276W–157L career · 1 line in 2022
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Fayez Malik
5W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Eddie Demirci
465W–153L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Edwin Mulhern
61W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Matthew Freeman
63W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.61
3.5
Carlos Suarez
29W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Mauro Martino
61W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Aaron Loewen
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
MALIK BASS
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tyrone Bass
46W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yaakov Buff
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.