Teams

Myers/JB/3Oaks

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-12vs Cissell/JB/APWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Gibson / Marvene Harrell vs Sheng Judilla / Lynette Chastain6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTera Harpole vs Jenny Rogers6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Cissell/JB/APWon 20
W#1 DoublesTera Harpole / Amy Gibson vs Lori Smith / Kelli Adkins6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Floyd vs Jenny Rogers6-2, 6-0
2026-04-23vs DiGaetano/JB/3OAKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesGloria Faircloth / Michelle Myers vs Ellen Lawrence / Jocelyn Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTiffany Floyd vs Tamara Lee0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarvene Harrell / Melanie Burnett vs Brandy Johnston / Niki Carver6-3, 6-2
2026-04-13vs DiGaetano/JB/3OAKSWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanne Bailey / Melanie Burnett vs Niki Carver / Tara Smith6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTera Harpole vs Caroline Wilson7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Floyd / Kristie Becker vs Jocelyn Johnson / Holly Robertson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-10vs DiGaetano/JB/3OAKSWon 21
W#1 DoublesGloria Faircloth / Melanie Burnett vs Renee Cobern / Tara Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTiffany Floyd vs Tamara Lee2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Myers / Tera Harpole vs Caroline Wilson / Brandy Johnston6-4, 6-4
2026-03-30vs Cissell/JB/APWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Myers / Tera Harpole vs Meredith Cook / Jenny Rogers6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Floyd vs Lynette Chastain6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarvene Harrell / Amy Gibson vs Marjorie Ivy / Misty Zaffarano6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Melanie Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Jeanne Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Gloria Faircloth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Tiffany Floyd
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.42
Marvene Harrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Tera Harpole
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.22
Amy Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.14
Kristie Becker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Burnett + Tera Harpole303 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Burnett + Jeanne Bailey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Burnett
25W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
Jeanne Bailey
18W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
Gloria Faircloth
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Tiffany Floyd
16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Marvene Harrell
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Tera Harpole
24W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Amy Gibson
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Kristie Becker
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.