Teams

Stetelman 4.0-5.0

2026 Tri-Level Doubles 18&Over · Women 4.0, 4.5, 5.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.36 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.0, 4.5, 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stetelman 4.0-5.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christa Hataway
published 5
4.29
Christy Stasney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brittany Stasney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Hannah Hopson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Carly Wise
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Carrie Olsson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Elizabeth Asmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Saia Stetelman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shelby Fritscher
published
Stephanie Dohner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Olsson + Elizabeth Asmar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christa Hataway
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Christy Stasney
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Brittany Stasney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Hannah Hopson
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Carly Wise
36W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Carrie Olsson
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Elizabeth Asmar
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Saia Stetelman
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Shelby Fritscher
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Dohner
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.