Teams

Dean's Team

2023 Adult 65 and Over League · 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-02vs Mike's TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesLloyd Ishikawa / Dean Takebayashi vs Lawrence Heintz / Ted Hong2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLorin Carmichael / Richard Cunningham vs Glenn Okada / Lester Oshiro4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGlenn Tada / Thomas Randle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-27vs Mike's TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Follett / Stephen Santos vs Dale Hayashi / Lawrence Heintz6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGlenn Tada / Richard Cunningham vs Michael Okumoto / Roy Shioji7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLloyd Ishikawa / Dean Takebayashi vs Ted Hong / Glenn Okada7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-19vs Mike's TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesHenri Aki / Thomas Randle vs Dale Hayashi / Roy Shioji7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEdward Allen / Glenn Tada vs Glenn Okada / Lester Oshiro6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Cunningham / Dean Takebayashi vs Lawrence Heintz / Michael Okumoto7-5, 6-4
2023-08-12vs Mike's TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdward Allen / Thomas Randle vs Dale Hayashi / Roy Shioji7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHenri Aki / Glenn Tada vs Lawrence Heintz / Ted Hong6-1, 6-2
2023-08-05vs Mike's TeamWon 10
W#2 DoublesHenri Aki / Dean Takebayashi vs Glenn Okada / Roy Shioji6-4, 6-4
2023-07-22vs Mike's TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesThomas Randle / Richard Cunningham vs Lawrence Heintz / Michael Okumoto7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGlenn Tada / Peter Follett vs Dale Hayashi / Glenn Okada6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dean's Team601714107
2Mike's Team0611734211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Glenn Tada
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Dean Takebayashi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Edward Allen
published
Lloyd Ishikawa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Follett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Randle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Takebayashi + Glenn Tada21140% games−7.0% vs expected
Lloyd Ishikawa + Glenn Tada303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Glenn Tada
94W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Dean Takebayashi
126W–142L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Edward Allen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lloyd Ishikawa
9W–1L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Follett
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Cunningham
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Randle
13W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.