Teams

IRV-Gilbertson

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 5.0 Mixed

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Nicholas Kampars
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Paul Ecker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results5 ties
2024-03-03Won 20
W#1 DoublesNicholas Kampars / Taren Taylor vs Abby Pace / Matthew Lucas4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Ecker / Cory Sebastian vs Lora Lord / Matthew Thoreson6-3, 6-2
2024-02-18Split 11
L#1 DoublesNicholas Kampars / Taren Taylor vs Matt McNair / Heather Davidson7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaul Ecker / Jacqueline Babb Milligan vs Katie Lee / Robert Wood6-1, 6-1
2024-02-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Ecker / Jacqueline Babb Milligan vs Trask Court / Kari Court5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Kampars / Taren Taylor vs Abby Pace / Robert Vukanovich7-5, 6-1
2024-01-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Kampars / Taren Taylor vs Nasser Khan / Heather Davidson6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Nicholas Kampars
27W–12L career
0%72%28%
3.03
3
Paul Ecker
36W–49L career
0%98%1%
2.80
3
Jacqueline Babb Milligan
35W–63L career
6%94%0%
2.69

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.