Teams

MTC McElgunn

2021 Richmond Mixed 55 & Over · Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-05vs ACAC StephensWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeon Cella / Susan Zielinski vs Randolph Moore / Jennifer Cubitt6-4, 6-1
2021-07-29vs Avalon MizrachWon 20
W#1 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Pamela Stidham vs Robert Calhoun / Diana Dull6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoug Cook / Susan Zielinski vs Gregory Blouch / Joni Albrecht7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-22vs Willow Oaks KellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Pamela Stidham vs Richard Kelly / Beth Kelly6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Sander / Susan Zielinski vs Kim Boys / Meda Lane6-2, 6-4
2021-07-19vs Avalon MizrachLost 01
L#3 DoublesSean McElgunn / Peggy McElgunn vs Frank Trani / Joni Albrecht6-7, 3-6
2021-07-15vs ACAC StephensLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeon Cella / Susan Zielinski vs Joseph Cipolla / Paula Bissett5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Pamela Stidham vs Jeffrey Foddrell / Valerie Stephens6-7, 2-6
2021-07-09vs Willow Oaks KellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesSean McElgunn / Peggy McElgunn vs Brad Williamson / Stephanie Burnside3-6, 3-6
2021-06-17vs Avalon MizrachLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Marks / Pamela Stidham vs Frank Mason / Nancy Mihalko3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Sander / Susan Zielinski vs Frank Trani / Renita Randolph7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSean McElgunn / Peggy McElgunn vs Barry George / Anna Baird3-6, 1-6
2021-06-10vs Willow Oaks KellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Pamela Stidham vs Terence Blackwood / Sandy Pisano3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Pamela Stidham
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Peggy McElgunn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Doug Cook
published 3.5
3.18
Carol Beth Cook
published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Marks
published
3.12
Robin Meyer
published
3.10
Anne Gilfillan
published 3.5
3.09
Susan Zielinski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Lewis Farinholt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Pamela Stidham
62W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Peggy McElgunn
144W–170L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Doug Cook
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Carol Beth Cook
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Tracy Marks
12W–16L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Robin Meyer
15W–23L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Anne Gilfillan
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Susan Zielinski
125W–157L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lewis Farinholt
3W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.