Teams

Br.Kearney18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-04vs Gr.Myers18ALost 01
L#1 SinglesJeff Heinz vs Greg Myers4-6, 2-6
2024-04-27vs Jo.Hastings18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesLou Hensley / James Butler vs Chris Nystrom / Scott Clark3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJeff Heinz vs William Slocum2-6, 1-6
2024-04-20vs Ro.Harris18ALost 01
L#2 SinglesJeff Heinz vs PEDRO J LEON6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-13vs Mi.Lalor18ASplit 11
L#1 SinglesJeff Heinz vs Alex Eilhauer4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Martinez / Lou Hensley vs Sean Gill / Scott Chalkley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-06vs De.Farmer18A3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLou Hensley / BILLY WILLIAMS vs Dennis Byrd Jr / Clay Fussell2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJeff Heinz vs PHI PHAM0-6, 1-6
2024-03-30vs Sp.Anderson18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeff Heinz / Steven Rochkind vs Stephen Mungenast / Anthony Gentile5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJoonho Oh / Lou Hensley vs Kevin Mann / Ryan Wilborne4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-02Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJeff Heinz vs Paul Warren1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Lou Hensley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Jamie Mishich
published
2.87
Jeff Heinz
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.62
Brian Buckingham
published 3
2.55
Steven Rochkind
published
2.53
Jared Dix
published
2.43
BILLY WILLIAMS
published 2.5
2.33
Lance Shrader
published
Joonho Oh
published
Ryan McDevitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan McDevitt + Jared Dix123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lou Hensley
122W–118L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jamie Mishich
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Jeff Heinz
40W–49L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Brian Buckingham
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Steven Rochkind
5W–36L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
Jared Dix
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
BILLY WILLIAMS
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%68%32%
2.43
Lance Shrader
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Joonho Oh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan McDevitt
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.