Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Wang-WN/SA

2024 Mixed Tri Level - 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#2 DoublesKevin Ikuta / Hatien Nguyen vs Cynthia Garcia / Yoshiki Hisamoto6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesZamir Birnbach / Adrienne Beauvois vs Hirsch Matani / Aleyeh Roknaldin4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJacob Shin / Hatien Nguyen vs Meera Prasad / Cedric Lozano1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKevin Ikuta / Hatien Nguyen vs David Lui / VICKY TRINH6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Beauvois / Kevin Ikuta vs Cedric Lozano / Jennifer Lichtman7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesIvan Salazar / Heidi Schuler vs Matt Hansen / Ghia Godfree2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Ikuta / Hatien Nguyen vs Cedric Lozano / Meera Prasad4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
published
4.11
Heidi Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Ivan Salazar
published
4.05
Jasmine Dai
published
3.85
Adrienne Beauvois
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Hatien Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Khin Aye
published
3.56
Genesis Arreola
published
3.54
Hong Ye
published
3.46
Nancy Ray
published
3.42
Willie Yeh
published
3.41
Kevin Ikuta
published
Jacob Shin
published
Jesse Wallis
published
Joseph Yamzon
published
Jun Young Kim
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Heidi Schuler
117W–78L career · 1 line in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Ivan Salazar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Jasmine Dai
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Adrienne Beauvois
152W–119L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Hatien Nguyen
130W–95L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Khin Aye
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Genesis Arreola
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Hong Ye
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
Nancy Ray
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Willie Yeh
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Kevin Ikuta
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Jacob Shin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jesse Wallis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Yamzon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jun Young Kim
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.