Teams

BHSC-Baseline Bandits-Ingersoll

2026 Charlottesville Combo Mixed · Charlottesville Combo Mixed 5.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 13 3:00 PM
Boar's Head Sports Club
Sep 15 8:00 PM
Boar's Head Sports Club
W#1 DoublesLaura Pietro / Justin Schaefer vs Kelly Owens / Joseph Hicks6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Chang / Jonathan Oliver vs Esther Bobbin / Casimer Kawecki6-4, 7-6
W#1 DoublesCarrie Sofka / Justin Schaefer vs Lewis Owens / Kelly Owens4-6, 4-2
W#2 DoublesErin Schneider / Jay Kauffmann vs Arlene Okun / Leigh Capshaw6-3, 6-0
2026-08-27vs BHSC-Orange Crush-Bobbin-Mixed 5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Oliver / Ellen McAllister vs Jannemieke Keener / Joseph Hicks2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesCarrie Sofka / Jonathan Oliver vs Jannemieke Keener / Leigh Capshaw6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Schneider / Justin Schaefer vs Nancy Polonitza / Mike Drude6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesDon Ingersoll / Laura Pietro vs Joseph Hicks / Kelly Owens5-2, 0-0
W#2 DoublesLewis Payne / Ronda Ingersoll vs Steve Spitzer / Arlene Okun7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJay Kauffmann / Erin Schneider vs Leigh Capshaw / Nancy Polonitza6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Charlottesville Combo Mixed 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BHSC-Baseline Bandits-Ingersoll2060128
2BHSC-Orange Crush-Bobbin-Mixed 5.502061268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Carrie Sofka
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Lisa Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Ronda Ingersoll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Erin Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Don Ingersoll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Ellen McAllister
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jay Kauffmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jonathan Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Pietro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lewis Payne
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Pietro + Lewis Payne314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carrie Sofka
8W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Lisa Chang
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.63
Ronda Ingersoll
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Erin Schneider
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Don Ingersoll
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Ellen McAllister
3W–9L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Jay Kauffmann
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Oliver
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lewis Payne
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.