Teams

Match Makers

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-11vs Lakewood 3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesShelley Puterman / Zoie Acadia vs Corinne Boisi / Margaret Fitzwilliam5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnn-Lee Chen / Alexis Feringa vs Audrey Wasser / Sharon Zissman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-12-08vs Arlington CrushersWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelley Puterman / Silvana Brinkman vs Tori Gregorios / Jessica Tierney6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2023-12-05vs Maryland MadnessSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYvette Fontenot / Zoie Acadia vs Stephanie Bozarth / Alexis Martin6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnn-Lee Chen / Bettina Lynn vs Diane Diner / Kimberly Stepherson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-10vs Norbeck NettersLost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Puterman / JoAnn Ward vs Jennifer Reidy / Tracy Brandt3-6, 5-7
2023-11-03vs Manor 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSilvana Brinkman / Zoie Acadia vs Kelley Donellan / Marijane Forde6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Zoie Acadia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Silvana Brinkman
published
3.43
Kathleen McGrath
published
3.39
Shannon Golub
published
3.35
Ann-Lee Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Shelley Puterman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Jody Tennant
published 3.5
3.25
JoAnn Ward
published
Cathy Pasquariello
published 3.5
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
3.21
Alexis Feringa
published 3.5
3.14
Tamara Clarke
published
3.04
Bettina Lynn
published 3.5
2.78
Andrea Foster
published 3
Laveta Duke
published
Mazie Efinger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamara Clarke + Jody Tennant4357% games+4.3% vs expected
Tamara Clarke + Kathleen McGrath6948% games−2.4% vs expected
Jody Tennant + Kathleen McGrath033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Zoie Acadia
359W–171L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Silvana Brinkman
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kathleen McGrath
34W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Shannon Golub
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Ann-Lee Chen
216W–224L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Shelley Puterman
86W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jody Tennant
45W–57L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
JoAnn Ward
34W–36L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cathy Pasquariello
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yvette Fontenot
17W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Alexis Feringa
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Tamara Clarke
56W–80L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Bettina Lynn
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Andrea Foster
28W–29L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Laveta Duke
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mazie Efinger
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.