Teams

Fernwood - Bean

2024 Adult 55 & Over-SW · Women 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-21vs Miller BrookhillLost 03
L#1 DoublesClyde Bean / Gail Ott vs Carolyn Stephens / Mary Miller3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFern Martin / Katy Campbell vs Carol Easley / Kimmie Polk6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRose Frazier / Victoria Ott Frye vs Denice Lambert / Lynn Taylor4-6, 1-6
2024-03-24vs Miller BrookhillLost 02
L#1 DoublesRose Frazier / Victoria Ott Frye vs Carol Easley / Nancy Fisher2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesClyde Bean / Gail Ott vs Terrie Hall / Marlene Cupit6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-23vs Miller BrookhillLost 12
L#1 DoublesRose Frazier / Victoria Ott Frye vs Nancy Fisher / Carol Easley2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesClyde Bean / Gail Ott vs Denice Lambert / Marlene Cupit6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesFern Martin / Katy Campbell vs Mary Miller / Lynn Taylor5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller Brookhill3072670
2Fernwood - Bean03271491

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clyde Bean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Gail Ott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Victoria Ott Frye
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Fern Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Katy Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rose Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Ott Frye + Rose Frazier1535% games−13.7% vs expected
Gail Ott + Clyde Bean2444% gamesnot enough data
Fern Martin + Katy Campbell1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clyde Bean
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Gail Ott
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Ott Frye
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Fern Martin
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katy Campbell
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rose Frazier
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.