Teams

Sequoyah/Tina Jones

2026 Sequoyah Southern Combo 55 & Over - Summer '26 · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sequoyah/Tina Jones000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Charlie Lewis
published 3.5
3.29
Suzanne Hanley
published
3.23
Lisa Quinn
published
2.90
Heather Ellington
published
2.86
Karlene Welty
published
2.67
Tina Jones
published
2.56
Ann Carroll
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charlie Lewis
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Suzanne Hanley
29W–27L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.29
Lisa Quinn
23W–31L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Heather Ellington
35W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Karlene Welty
13W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Tina Jones
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.67
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.