Teams

BC-MCC/VeronicaDeutsch

2025 TRI LEVEL MX April · July - BC

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for July - BC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Tammy Hoffman
published
3.80
Pamela Lopez
published
3.73
Renee Tinker
published
3.70
Kelli Spriggs
published
3.64
Kris Rone
published 4
3.62
Tarik Hossain
published
3.61
Keith Simpson
published
3.51
Rick Rumpp
published
3.51
Kristina Mohr
published
3.46
Monika Hoffman
published
3.45
Brittanie Budinger
published 3.5
3.24
David Nachman
published 3.5
3.15
Kristin Sibson
published
3.11
Rachel Alexander
published
3.11
Dave Binney
published 3.5
3.08
Gregory Ray
published
2.97
Russell Hossain
published
2.93
Veronica Deutsch
published
2.91
Zoe Frank
published
2.81
Dan Grampp
published 3
2.44
Nahia Hossain
published
Linda Cronkite
published
Lisa Handelman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Deutsch + Keith Simpson2345% games+0.8% vs expected
Kris Rone + Keith Simpson1434% gamesnot enough data
Kris Rone + Tarik Hossain224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Hoffman
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Renee Tinker
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Kelli Spriggs
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Kris Rone
71W–60L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
Tarik Hossain
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Keith Simpson
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Rick Rumpp
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Kristina Mohr
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Monika Hoffman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Brittanie Budinger
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
David Nachman
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Kristin Sibson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Rachel Alexander
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dave Binney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Gregory Ray
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Russell Hossain
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Veronica Deutsch
44W–93L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Zoe Frank
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Dan Grampp
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Nahia Hossain
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Linda Cronkite
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Handelman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.