Teams

Ritch - Longview

2025 NETX Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-30vs HopkinsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Ambrosius / Kurt Ritch vs Fabio Martinez / David Youngblood3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Looney / Bing Corpier vs Ted Debbs / Bill Walker2-6, 0-6
2025-03-23vs HopkinsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Ambrosius / Charles Looney vs Fabio Martinez / Bill Walker2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBing Corpier / Barry Metz vs Ken Coulon / Joseph Woelkers6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-16vs HopkinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJ T Slaughter / Mark Ambrosius vs Fabio Martinez / Charles Hassell6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBing Corpier / Charles Looney vs David Youngblood / Bill Walker0-6, 1-6
2025-03-02vs HopkinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesEugene Cady / J T Slaughter vs Fabio Martinez / Bill Walker7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMark Ambrosius / Barry Metz vs Charles Hassell / David Youngblood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Looney / Bing Corpier vs Ted Debbs / Joseph Woelkers2-6, 3-6
2025-02-16vs HopkinsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJ T Slaughter / Eugene Cady vs Fabio Martinez / Charles Hassell4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Ambrosius / Bing Corpier vs Ted Debbs / Ken Coulon4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Barry Metz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Charles Looney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.20
Bing Corpier
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Eugene Cady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
J T Slaughter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kurt Ritch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Ambrosius
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Looney + Bing Corpier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barry Metz
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
2.5
Charles Looney
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Bing Corpier
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Eugene Cady
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
J T Slaughter
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kurt Ritch
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Ambrosius
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.