Teams

Avila Mutiny - B. Bailey

2022 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-23vs HCC - S. BillerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Evans / Jeffrey Evans vs Daniel Videtto / Chris Canfield3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarney Bailey / Roger Cypriano vs Samuel Biller / Kevin Platt7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-16vs HCC - S. BillerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Evans / Richard Sobieray vs Chris Canfield / Robert Graham7-5, 6-3
2022-03-26vs HCC - S. BillerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Evans / James Evans vs Ignacio Molina / Randall Meisner6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Zack / Roger Cypriano vs Daniel Videtto / Chris Canfield0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-19vs HCC - S. BillerLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Evans / Felix Tromp vs Samuel Biller / Robert Graham6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRoger Cypriano / William Malone vs Brent Filbert / Kevin Platt6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Evans / Martin Revello vs Ignacio Molina / Randall Meisner2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Jeffrey Evans
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.13
James Evans
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Charlton Johnson
published 4.5
4.03
Felix Tromp
published 4.5
3.87
Paul Zack
published
3.76
Barney Bailey
published 4
3.58
Martin Revello
published
Michael Kosloske
published
Roger Cypriano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Evans + James Evans5949% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Evans
84W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
James Evans
21W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Charlton Johnson
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Felix Tromp
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
Paul Zack
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Barney Bailey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Martin Revello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Michael Kosloske
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roger Cypriano
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.