Teams

Mandal 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.5 Men Singles Mon

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-26vs Hilliard 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesROBIN MANDAL vs Brian Jones1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTravis Beeson vs Chris Sigley4-6, 5-7
2026-07-17vs Dover 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAmos Quick vs Bryan Bly3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTravis Beeson vs Christopher Moser1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-13vs Core 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAmos Quick vs Grayson Blow2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesROBIN MANDAL vs Bobby Powell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-29vs Hilliard 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTravis Beeson vs Joseph Speight7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAmos Quick vs Scott Laughlin6-2, 7-5
2026-06-26vs Core 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMWon 10
W#1 SinglesROBIN MANDAL vs Tan Ren6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-15vs Dover 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMLost 02
L#2 SinglesTravis Beeson vs Ashley Fuquay4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJoe Beck vs Christopher Moser4-6, 1-6
2026-06-08vs Hilliard 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesAmos Quick vs Robert Davis4-6
L#2 SinglesROBIN MANDAL vs Scott Laughlin1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJoe Beck vs Chris Sigley0-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs Core 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJoe Beck vs Tan Ren4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesROBIN MANDAL vs Michael Raley2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-18vs Dover 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesROBIN MANDAL vs Matthew Dunning3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAmos Quick vs Will Martin6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Men Singles Mon
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hilliard 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PM63151228223
2Dover 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PM63151228226
3Mandal 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PM45131435262
4Core 40s 3.5M Singles Mon PM2791840272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Amos Quick
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
3.15
Travis Beeson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.04
ROBIN MANDAL
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.88
Joe Beck
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amos Quick
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
Travis Beeson
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
ROBIN MANDAL
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Joe Beck
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.