Teams

TOC.Puttoju

2022 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 18 & Over 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-30vs MVL.StognerWon 10
W#1 DoublesGowthaman Mohan / John Doe vs Karthik Palakode / Dipen Vyas6-1, 6-1
2022-06-23vs MVL.HariharanWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabriel Iocco / Jack Hu vs Deepak Jayashankaran / Santha Perian3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-22vs TOC.SachanWon 10
W#1 DoublesGowthaman Mohan / SRINIVASRAGHAVA SURENDRA vs Nitin Maheshwari / Srinath Ekkad6-4, 6-4
2022-06-09vs TOC.PuriWon 10
W#1 DoublesRanga Narasimhan / Gowthaman Mohan vs Sanjay Ambardar / Vijay Sharma7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-02vs LOCH.HolsoppleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJack Hu / Ranga Narasimhan vs Jeff Estroff / Everett Laborde5-7, 2-6
2022-05-26vs LOCH.BaldwinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJack Hu / Ranga Narasimhan vs Brian Heaphy / Eric Weber3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 18 & Over 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
3.82
Jack Hu
published 4
3.82
Gabriel Iocco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Gowthaman Mohan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
3.54
Ranga Narasimhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Naga Mahesh Desu
published
3.09
Jagan Puttoju
published 3.5
3.03
Vimal Kumar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Hu + Gabriel Iocco1543% games−1.9% vs expected
Vamsee Pasangulapati + Gowthaman Mohan5065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vamsee Pasangulapati
136W–76L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jack Hu
29W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gabriel Iocco
118W–116L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gowthaman Mohan
64W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Balaji Radhakrishnan
17W–22L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Ranga Narasimhan
56W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Naga Mahesh Desu
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jagan Puttoju
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Vimal Kumar
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.