Teams

SDNC 3.5 San Dieguito (Sun 2:30)/ Evers

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- SDNC · SDNC Women 3.5 GNO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings11 teams · SDNC Women 3.5 GNO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC 3.5 FRCC (Wed 7-9PM)/ Hackett000000
2SDNC 3.5 Rancho Valencia (Sun 2:30)/ Adams000000
3SDNC 3.5 San Dieguito (Sun 2:30)/ Evers000000
4SDNC 3.5 Scripps Aviary (Sun 2:30)/ Garcia000000
5SDNC 3.5 Crosby (1@ 12:30PM:2@2:30PM)/ Birtsas000000
6SDNC 3.5 FRCC (Sun 2:30)/ Wolgast000000
7SDNC 3.5 FRCC (Wed 7-9PM)/ Li000000
8SDNC 3.5 Santaluz (Sun 2:30)/ Reinoso000000
9SDNC 3.5 Santaluz Club (Wed 6PM)/ Wagner000000
10SDNC 3.5 KCP (Sun 2:30)/ Gerardi000000
11SDNC 3.5 RPTC (Wed 6PM)/ Wilson000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Kimberly Evers
published
3.31
Samantha Cook
published
Diane Czajkowski
published 3.5
3.25
Laura Kimball
published
3.11
Susan Thorsell
published 3.5
3.11
Debby Latterich
published 3.5
Olga Ignatova
published
Rebecca Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debby Latterich + Laura Kimball033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Evers
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Samantha Cook
26W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Diane Czajkowski
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Kimball
14W–21L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Susan Thorsell
17W–33L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Debby Latterich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Olga Ignatova
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Walsh
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.