Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Vermehren

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · SD - Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 3.0 La Jolla TC/ Salyards000000
2SD 3.0 Mtn View/ Tomita000000
3SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Evans000000
4SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun000000
5SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Giacalone000000
6SD 3.0 Coronado Cays/ Anderson000000
7SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Vermehren000000
8SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Morton000000
9SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Escobedo000000
10SD 3.0 Balboa TC/ Labarre000000
11SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Holzer000000
12SD 3.0 Mtn View/ Blancarte000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Leslie Vineyard
published 3
2.76
Carla Guastoni
published 3
2.75
Veronica Marti
published
2.74
2.72
Eleni Capetanakis
published
2.71
Elizabeth Conlon
published
2.69
2.65
Marlis Vermehren
published
2.64
Michelle Gilmore
published
2.62
Jennifer Franklin
published
2.47
Patricia Padilla
published
2.46
Heidi Nevitt
published 3
2.46
Anne Rinko
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Guastoni + Anne Rinko033 matchesnot enough data
Dianne Lookabaugh + Marlis Vermehren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maricarmen Inchaurrandieta
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Leslie Vineyard
30W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Carla Guastoni
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Veronica Marti
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Dianne Lookabaugh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Eleni Capetanakis
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Elizabeth Conlon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Whitney Stockstad
40W–16L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Marlis Vermehren
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Michelle Gilmore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Jennifer Franklin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Patricia Padilla
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Heidi Nevitt
7W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
3
Anne Rinko
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.