Teams

CACI RED

2021 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-24vs HV BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Buchanan / Edward Budd vs Beau Ellis / John Healy6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJohn Cranston vs Peter Sjoberg2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Alvarez / Wayne Anderson vs Jan Dorfman / Jack Marr6-2, 6-4
2021-04-17vs WC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Alvarez / David Marks vs Craig Masur / Whitney Schrandt6-3, 6-2
2021-04-10vs WC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Cranston / Richard Lynn vs Jeffrey Burton / Volodymyr Sukhovetskyy6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTim Buchanan vs Pete Petrou6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Marks / Edward Budd vs Brad Mosch / Jeff Milanovich6-2, 6-1
2021-04-03vs SKY REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Buchanan / Scott Alvarez vs Fabio Massena / Scott Hermansen6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJohn Cranston vs John Bringenberg6-0, 6-2
2021-03-28vs VCC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott Alvarez / Wayne Anderson vs David Vreeman / Sri Sundaram6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Marks / Edward Budd vs Clint Georg / Larry Puttmann7-5, 6-2
2021-03-27vs LTFC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Lynn / Edward Budd vs AJ Howard / Jeff Handlin2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWayne Anderson / John Cranston vs Jonathan Moore / Darren Cutter2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
John Cranston
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Edward Budd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Scott Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Lynn
published
Tim Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Wayne Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Alvarez + Wayne Anderson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Cranston
68W–57L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Edward Budd
90W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
Scott Alvarez
66W–96L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.86
Richard Lynn
18W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Buchanan
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wayne Anderson
26W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.