Teams

5-MBland-CHTC

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-03vs 1-MHolt-HS-6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Jay Bauer vs Scott Hartman / Valdis Stiebris3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Bland / Gary Glish vs Ian Lockwood / Mark Macdonald2-6, 5-7
2023-09-26vs 2-ROakley-EV 40 6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Chris Stephenson vs Dan Dillon / Bart Smith6-2, 6-3
2023-09-19vs 3-JMontague-CCC 40Won 10
W#2 DoublesGary Glish / Chris Stephenson vs Christopher LeGrand / Arash Chehrazi6-3, 6-2
2023-09-12vs 4-RMcGarrah-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Chris Stephenson vs Mark Fossum / Adam Lang6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGary Glish / Carmelo Cataudella vs James McWhorter / JEFF CHANDLER7-6, 7-5
2023-08-24vs 3-JMontague-CCC 40Won 20
W#1 DoublesMark Bland / Doug Kopec vs Chuck Clark / Christopher LeGrand6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / Chris Stephenson vs Stephen Arrowood / Travis Angle6-0, 6-1
2023-08-22vs 2-ROakley-EV 40 6.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGary Glish / Jay Bauer vs Ryan Boyles / Duffy Guschel6-7, 1-6
2023-08-08vs 4-RMcGarrah-HRWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonovan Khamphasong / David Gilliam vs Ashraf Habib / George Corbett6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Terrence Tan
published
3.30
Doug Kopec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Gary Glish
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Donovan Khamphasong
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Kurt Rosenkrantz
published
2.74
Eric Vance
published
2.70
Mark Bland
published
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Kopec + Gary Glish18662% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terrence Tan
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Doug Kopec
82W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Gary Glish
140W–124L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Donovan Khamphasong
54W–68L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Kurt Rosenkrantz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Eric Vance
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Mark Bland
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Stephen Ryan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.