Teams

Green 6.5 40+

2025 Southern Combo Doubles 40 & Over - HSV · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-26vs Moorer 40+ 6.5 comboLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolina Curry / LASHONDA SMITH vs Laura Jones / Marianna Wester7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Pant / Lori White vs Leslie Moorer / Jenny Gibson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStaci Hackenberg / Michell Ford vs Jennifer Helton / Jennifer Blue2-6, 6-7
2025-08-05vs Moorer 40+ 6.5 comboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarolina Curry / Debbie Haythorn vs Ginger Moore / Madeline Mullins6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGinger Green / Staci Hackenberg vs Leslie Moorer / Marianna Wester6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Diana Hurewitz
published 3.5
3.30
Ginger Green
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.25
LASHONDA SMITH
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Maranatha Brackett
published
3.05
Kim McCandless
published
2.94
Carolina Curry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Michell Ford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Lisa Pant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
2.81
Debbie Haythorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.81
Bushra Younus
published 3
2.79
Staci Hackenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maranatha Brackett + Bushra Younus6067% games+9.4% vs expected
Diana Hurewitz + Maranatha Brackett4255% games+1.8% vs expected
Lisa Pant + Michell Ford134 matchesnot enough data
LASHONDA SMITH + Michell Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Pant + Debbie Haythorn213 matchesnot enough data
Maranatha Brackett + Angelique Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana Hurewitz
71W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
Ginger Green
96W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
LASHONDA SMITH
22W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Maranatha Brackett
57W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Kim McCandless
11W–21L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Carolina Curry
23W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Michell Ford
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Lisa Pant
40W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Angelique Johnson
45W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3.5
Debbie Haythorn
43W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Bushra Younus
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Staci Hackenberg
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Dianne Higginbotham
22W–25L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.