Teams

L. Fetty

2024 Mixed 18 & Over - NAZ · Mixed 8.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-17vs NAZ/Unrein/ 18 & over mixed/8.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesLiz Murrieta / Owen Thomas vs Cody Kacerek / Laura Nicol4-6
W#2 DoublesLeyton Fetty / Dana Jacko vs Andrew Vo / Lisa Joseph6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAva Strasser / Sterling Fetty vs Charo Deglane / Sam Blankenship6-4, 7-6
2024-08-17vs NAZ/Unrein/ 18 & over mixed/8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeyton Fetty / Dana Jacko vs Andrew Vo / Lisa Joseph6-1, 7-5
2024-07-21vs NAZ/Unrein/ 18 & over mixed/8.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesSterling Fetty / Liz Murrieta vs Laura Nicol / Cody Kacerek6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDana Jacko / Madison Reitzammer vs Serena Unrein / Paul Miller7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-21vs NAZ/Unrein/ 18 & over mixed/8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Desy / Leyton Fetty vs Kristen Downs / Cody Kacerek3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDana Jacko / Madison Reitzammer vs Serena Unrein / Paul Miller3-6, 4-6
2024-07-14vs NAZ/Unrein/ 18 & over mixed/8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Desy / Owen Thomas vs Laura Nicol / Cody Kacerek0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDana Jacko / Leyton Fetty vs Lisa Joseph / Paul Miller6-2, 0-2
2024-07-14vs NAZ/Unrein/ 18 & over mixed/8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeyton Fetty / Dana Jacko vs Thomas Green / Catherine Salgado2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mixed 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1L. Fetty4210819160
2NAZ/Unrein/ 18 & over mixed/8.02481023168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Sterling Fetty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Liz Murrieta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Dana Jacko
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Elizabeth Desy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sterling Fetty + Liz Murrieta3266% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sterling Fetty
28W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Liz Murrieta
32W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Dana Jacko
54W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Elizabeth Desy
20W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.