Teams

CCahoon

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-15vs BRobinson 18+Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Wolborsky / Aimee Mikula vs Brittany Robinson / Sarah Winstead7-5, 4-1
2022-05-08vs IPSpellLost 01
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Jennifer Kazmierczak5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-01vs KLamb 18+Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Jeannette Walker1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Lee Gillenwater / Megan Lynch vs Jessie Brinkley / Kimberly Lamb0-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesShannon Parham / Jill Wolborsky vs Jo Ann Novak / Joanna Valler2-6, 0-6
2022-04-24vs IJGrossanoLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Lee Gillenwater / Aimee Mikula vs Beth Robertson / Michele Zaytoun5-7, 4-6
2022-04-03vs KRoseLost 02
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Christa Hochstrasser1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Lynch / Jill Wolborsky vs Karen Rose / Niezle Scott2-6, 0-6
2022-03-27vs AWeaverLost 01
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs MacKenzie Snow2-6, 2-6
2022-03-20vs JPhillipsLost 02
L#2 SinglesLaura Lee Gillenwater vs Betsy Fulcher1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Lynch / Jill Wolborsky vs Ashley Walker / Katherine Seawell-Lewis2-6, 2-6
2022-03-13vs SLittletonLost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Wolborsky / Shannon Parham vs Cathy Williams / Kristi Gilreath3-6, 3-6
2022-03-06vs MPhillipsHolscherLost 01
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Marlet Edwards2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Merab Puleo
published
2.91
Amy Cuni
published 3
2.77
Stephanie Black
published
Chandra Cahoon
published 3
2.72
Laura Lee Gillenwater
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.60
Wendie Hill
published
2.60
Shannon Parham
published
2.59
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.25
Jill Wolborsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Merab Puleo
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Amy Cuni
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Stephanie Black
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Chandra Cahoon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Laura Lee Gillenwater
27W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Wendie Hill
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
Shannon Parham
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Mandy Steinhardt
53W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Jill Wolborsky
41W–101L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.